<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality Making Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2006/06/09/net-neutrality-making-headlines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2006/06/09/net-neutrality-making-headlines/</link>
	<description>Weblog of Wesley Fryer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Farnham</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2006/06/09/net-neutrality-making-headlines/comment-page-1/#comment-5019</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Farnham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/?p=1069#comment-5019</guid>
		<description>My greatest concern about the Net Neutrality issue is the possibility of a botched law being passed by Congress. A botched law would be far worse than no law, because it would distort the system and provide new paths for manipulation that do not currently exist. The manipulations would be legal, even though they might violate the original intentions of the law. 

A botched law that seeks to preserve or impose network neutrality could in fact eliminate whatever level of network neutrality can be said to exist today.

Kevin Farnham
Author: &quot;MySpace Safety: 51 Tips for Teens and Parents&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My greatest concern about the Net Neutrality issue is the possibility of a botched law being passed by Congress. A botched law would be far worse than no law, because it would distort the system and provide new paths for manipulation that do not currently exist. The manipulations would be legal, even though they might violate the original intentions of the law. </p>
<p>A botched law that seeks to preserve or impose network neutrality could in fact eliminate whatever level of network neutrality can be said to exist today.</p>
<p>Kevin Farnham<br />
Author: &#8220;MySpace Safety: 51 Tips for Teens and Parents&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.056 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 481/488 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: dx8j8q50h69a5.cloudfront.net (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.speedofcreativity.org @ 2012-02-09 21:47:18 -->
