Parents getting more involved in DSN
posted in isafety, web 2.0 |I don’t know if anyone else has already come up with one, but I think we need to start using an acronym for “digital social networking.” How about DSN? (The military loves acronyms, and I am finding that corporate America does too.) I went ahead and created a new English WikiPedia page for “Digital Social Networking” today. Feel free to edit and add to what is there and share the link!
According to the article “Why mom enlisted an online sleuth to keep tabs on child,” more parents are recognizing the importance of getting involved with the virtual activities of their children:
“Internet predators haven’t changed over the years, but what has changed are the ways they can contact and infiltrate through cellphones, IMs, blogs, social websites and a number of other Internet tools,” says Mr. Colburn.
Generally, parents are not as involved partly because of the rise of two-income families (i.e. two absent parents) as well as the increased number of computers and child-owned cellphones per household, and the technological generation gap that has kept cyber-sophisticated children light-years ahead of their techno-befuddled guardians.
But now, more are beginning to recognize the dangers of such neglect. Using an array of new monitoring, blocking, and filtering technology, they are more determined to protect their kids from the consequences they have seen in the media.
This is a positive sign, although I contend just more F2F TALKING (face to face communication) can do wonders. The problem is not the technology, so the ultimate solution will not be found via technology, whether we are talking about filters, blocks, etc. As I have noted previously, most of the problems we see through the window of technology and DSN do not have to do with technology– they have to do with other things. Parents need to be more involved in the lives of their kids, and communication is the key. This article is a positive voice in a sea of general negativity regarding DSN.
The issues raised here again touch on control, creativity, and education. Parent Larry Estes, quoted in the article, has the right attitude:
“We feel education is the best form of control,” says Estes. “If we tried to control everything, they would just go out and seek it somewhere else.”
We can’t shut down the Internet, and we can’t protect our children from every offensive or inappropriate resource out there or yet to be created. So what must we do? Help equip them with the skills and values they’ll need to make good decisions WHEN WE ARE NOT THERE TO INTERVENE. Other authors have called this “socially inoculating” young people for the real world. Although it was written before DSN became a reality, the best book I have read on these issues is Stephen Glenn and Jane Nelson’s book “Raising Self-Reliant Children in a Self-Indulgent World: Seven Building Blocks for Developing Capable Young People.” We’ve always needed to do a better job communicating and helping raise our young people– DSN is just providing a window into reality that drives the point home even more strongly.
Thanks to AHF for this article, and for getting me to read Glenn and Nelson’s books in the first place! And for doing a fair bit of social inoculation with me in my youth! ![]()
On this day..
- Mac OS 10.5.3 Address Book Syncs to Google! - 2008
- links for 2008-06-22 - 2008
- Hallmark of 21st Century Learning: Use of web video - 2007
- Administrators Who Blog, Read Blogs, and Podcast - 2007
- Most remarkable distance learning stories - 2006
- Second Life First Impressions - 2006
- Homeless bloggers share their voices - 2006
- Empowering the pioneers - 2006



Flickr/wfryer
Myspace/openingthedoor
Facebook/Wesley Fryer
Linkedin/wesfryer
Twitter/wfryer
YouTube/wfryer
Del.icio.us/wfryer
Wikipedia/wfryer
Wishlist/Wesley Fryer
Technorati/wfryer





