<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Following blog conversations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Darrow</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/#comment-30196</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Darrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/#comment-30196</guid>
		<description>Another useful tool to follow blog conversations I discovered is:  http://www.blogpulse.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another useful tool to follow blog conversations I discovered is:  <a href="http://www.blogpulse.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogpulse.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Ragone</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/#comment-30195</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Ragone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 05:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/#comment-30195</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, Wes.  I love comment tracking, co.comment or cocomment (that's a lawsuit waiting to happen).  It's an important part of blogging, and it is nice to see what develops in conversations started through comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Wes.  I love comment tracking, co.comment or cocomment (that&#8217;s a lawsuit waiting to happen).  It&#8217;s an important part of blogging, and it is nice to see what develops in conversations started through comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley Fryer</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/#comment-30183</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley Fryer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/#comment-30183</guid>
		<description>I hadn't heard of or used &lt;a href="http://www.cocomment.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;CoComment&lt;/a&gt;, Ewan, so thanks for sharing that as an alternative. I'm not sure which is best, but I do think this functionality is excellent. Like Dean I think the archiving and tracking of comments we make in the blogosphere are very important. Blog dialog is certainly not as linear and clearly threaded as what you can see on some discussion boards, but the threads are there and tools which help link us into different parts of those dialogs are immensely useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard of or used <a href="http://www.cocomment.com/" rel="nofollow">CoComment</a>, Ewan, so thanks for sharing that as an alternative. I&#8217;m not sure which is best, but I do think this functionality is excellent. Like Dean I think the archiving and tracking of comments we make in the blogosphere are very important. Blog dialog is certainly not as linear and clearly threaded as what you can see on some discussion boards, but the threads are there and tools which help link us into different parts of those dialogs are immensely useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Shareski</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/#comment-30181</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Shareski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/#comment-30181</guid>
		<description>I've been using CoComment as Ewan mentions and have found it only slightly helpful.  I love the fact it stores my comments.  But the RSS function seems wonky.  I'd like to subscribe via RSS to all my comments in one place. CoComments promises this but I don't think it works that well. Alan Levine recently wrote about this service.
http://cogdogblog.com/2006/12/19/adios-cocomment/

I may look at Co.comments as an alternative. I think we need to feel the same way about archiving our comments as we are about our own blog posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using CoComment as Ewan mentions and have found it only slightly helpful.  I love the fact it stores my comments.  But the RSS function seems wonky.  I&#8217;d like to subscribe via RSS to all my comments in one place. CoComments promises this but I don&#8217;t think it works that well. Alan Levine recently wrote about this service.<br />
<a href="http://cogdogblog.com/2006/12/19/adios-cocomment/" rel="nofollow">http://cogdogblog.com/2006/12/19/adios-cocomment/</a></p>
<p>I may look at Co.comments as an alternative. I think we need to feel the same way about archiving our comments as we are about our own blog posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan McIntosh</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/#comment-30180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan McIntosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/01/06/following-blog-conversations/#comment-30180</guid>
		<description>The CoComment service (for those who don't know, this is different from the one above) has ironed out most of the problems you mention above and offers a really stable service with the new Firefox, too. What would make you trump for co.mment over CoComment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CoComment service (for those who don&#8217;t know, this is different from the one above) has ironed out most of the problems you mention above and offers a really stable service with the new Firefox, too. What would make you trump for co.mment over CoComment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.227 seconds -->
