<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confronting the Wicked Problems of Teaching with Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/03/27/confronting-the-wicked-problems-of-teaching-with-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/03/27/confronting-the-wicked-problems-of-teaching-with-technology/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Moving at the Speed of Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Education needs to be read/write</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/03/27/confronting-the-wicked-problems-of-teaching-with-technology/#comment-33767</link>
		<dc:creator>Moving at the Speed of Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Education needs to be read/write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 04:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/03/27/confronting-the-wicked-problems-of-teaching-with-technology/#comment-33767</guid>
		<description>[...] Given the alternative of a bus ride without iPods or laptops, I suppose this project in Arkansas has some merit and value. If the program&#8217;s champions fail to empower students to use their digital devices to both WRITE and CREATE as well as CONSUME content from the web, I think they are going to fail at a basic level to fully leverage the power of their investment and the protean tools they&#8217;ve purchased with taxpayer dollars. (I heard the word &#8220;protean&#8221; used a couple of weeks ago at the SITE conference to describe the versatility of digital technologies like computers, which are fundamentally different from fixed-purpose, traditional educational tools like the chalkboard, overhead projector, pencil and microscope.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Given the alternative of a bus ride without iPods or laptops, I suppose this project in Arkansas has some merit and value. If the program&#8217;s champions fail to empower students to use their digital devices to both WRITE and CREATE as well as CONSUME content from the web, I think they are going to fail at a basic level to fully leverage the power of their investment and the protean tools they&#8217;ve purchased with taxpayer dollars. (I heard the word &#8220;protean&#8221; used a couple of weeks ago at the SITE conference to describe the versatility of digital technologies like computers, which are fundamentally different from fixed-purpose, traditional educational tools like the chalkboard, overhead projector, pencil and microscope.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moving at the Speed of Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good teaching with technology DOES make a difference</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/03/27/confronting-the-wicked-problems-of-teaching-with-technology/#comment-33481</link>
		<dc:creator>Moving at the Speed of Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good teaching with technology DOES make a difference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 04:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/03/27/confronting-the-wicked-problems-of-teaching-with-technology/#comment-33481</guid>
		<description>[...] Today&#8217;s AP article &#8220;Study eyes effect of tech on classroom&#8221; is yet another example of media oversimplification of &#8220;wicked challenges&#8221; that are faced by teachers every day, particularly when it comes to the use of educational technology. According to the article: Going high-tech doesn&#8217;t lead to higher math and reading scores, according to a federal study. The study on the effectiveness of education technology was released late Wednesday by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, a research arm of the Education Department. The study found achievement scores were no higher in classrooms using reading and math software products than in classrooms without the new products. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today&#8217;s AP article &#8220;Study eyes effect of tech on classroom&#8221; is yet another example of media oversimplification of &#8220;wicked challenges&#8221; that are faced by teachers every day, particularly when it comes to the use of educational technology. According to the article: Going high-tech doesn&#8217;t lead to higher math and reading scores, according to a federal study. The study on the effectiveness of education technology was released late Wednesday by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, a research arm of the Education Department. The study found achievement scores were no higher in classrooms using reading and math software products than in classrooms without the new products. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using Technology to Tell Stories &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/03/27/confronting-the-wicked-problems-of-teaching-with-technology/#comment-33383</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Technology to Tell Stories &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/03/27/confronting-the-wicked-problems-of-teaching-with-technology/#comment-33383</guid>
		<description>[...] Todayâ€™s AP article â€œStudy eyes effect of tech on classroomâ€ is yet another example of media oversimplification of â€œwicked challengesâ€ that are faced by teachers every day, particularly when it comes to the use of educational technology. According to the article: Going high-tech doesnâ€™t lead to higher math and reading scores, according to a federal study. The study on the effectiveness of education technology was released late Wednesday by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, a research arm of the Education Department. The study found achievement scores were no higher in classrooms using reading and math software products than in classrooms without the new products. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Todayâ€™s AP article â€œStudy eyes effect of tech on classroomâ€ is yet another example of media oversimplification of â€œwicked challengesâ€ that are faced by teachers every day, particularly when it comes to the use of educational technology. According to the article: Going high-tech doesnâ€™t lead to higher math and reading scores, according to a federal study. The study on the effectiveness of education technology was released late Wednesday by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, a research arm of the Education Department. The study found achievement scores were no higher in classrooms using reading and math software products than in classrooms without the new products. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HVWP Tech Team &#8216;06 &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/03/27/confronting-the-wicked-problems-of-teaching-with-technology/#comment-33382</link>
		<dc:creator>HVWP Tech Team &#8216;06 &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/03/27/confronting-the-wicked-problems-of-teaching-with-technology/#comment-33382</guid>
		<description>[...] Todayâ€™s AP article â€œStudy eyes effect of tech on classroomâ€ is yet another example of media oversimplification of â€œwicked challengesâ€ that are faced by teachers every day, particularly when it comes to the use of educational technology. According to the article: Going high-tech doesnâ€™t lead to higher math and reading scores, according to a federal study. The study on the effectiveness of education technology was released late Wednesday by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, a research arm of the Education Department. The study found achievement scores were no higher in classrooms using reading and math software products than in classrooms without the new products. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Todayâ€™s AP article â€œStudy eyes effect of tech on classroomâ€ is yet another example of media oversimplification of â€œwicked challengesâ€ that are faced by teachers every day, particularly when it comes to the use of educational technology. According to the article: Going high-tech doesnâ€™t lead to higher math and reading scores, according to a federal study. The study on the effectiveness of education technology was released late Wednesday by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, a research arm of the Education Department. The study found achievement scores were no higher in classrooms using reading and math software products than in classrooms without the new products. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.204 seconds -->
