<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking WalMart Patronage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OLDaily[ä¸­æ–‡ç‰ˆ] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007å¹´4æœˆ16æ—¥</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/#comment-33774</link>
		<dc:creator>OLDaily[ä¸­æ–‡ç‰ˆ] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007å¹´4æœˆ16æ—¥</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/#comment-33774</guid>
		<description>[...] ç¬¬äºŒåˆ™å†…å®¹æ˜¯Wesley Fryerçš„å¸–å­ï¼Œé¢˜ç›®â€œé‡æ–°æ€è€ƒå¯¹æ²ƒå°”çŽ›çš„æƒ é¡¾â€ï¼Œè®°å½•äº†ä»–çœ‹äº†å…³äºŽè¿™ä¸ªä¼ä¸šå·¨å¤´è®°å½•ç‰‡ä¹‹åŽçš„æ„Ÿå—ã€‚æˆ‘è§‰å¾—ä»–åœ¨è®¨è®ºä¸­è¯´åˆ°äº†ç‚¹å„¿ä¸Šï¼Œæœ€åŽå½’ç»“åœ¨ä¿¡ä»°å’Œç†æ€§çš„èžåˆï¼šâ€œæ‰€æœ‰çš„äººç±»åº”è¯¥ä¹Ÿæœ‰æƒåˆ©è¢«ä½œä¸ºç»ˆæžå­˜åœ¨å¯¹å¾…ï¼Œè€Œä¸ä»…ä»…æ˜¯ä¸€ç§åˆ©ç”¨æ‰‹æ®µã€‚è¿™ç§è§‚ç‚¹åŒæ—¶å‡ºçŽ°åœ¨äº†ä¼Šæ›¼åŠªå°”.åº·å¾·ã€è€¶ç¨£åŸºç£ä»¥åŠå…¶ä»–å¾ˆå¤šäººé‚£é‡Œã€‚è¿›è¡Œä¸­çš„è¯†å­—èƒ½åŠ›çš„å¼€å‘å’ŒåŸ¹å…»å¯¹æ‰€æœ‰äººéƒ½æ˜¯ä¸€ç§æ ¸å¿ƒçš„éœ€æ±‚â€¦â€¦æ•™è‚²è€…æ¯å¤©éƒ½åœ¨åšç€è¿™ä¸ªç¥žåœ£çš„å·¥ä½œï¼Œè¿™éƒ¨ç‰‡å­å‰æ‰€æœªæœ‰åœ°è®©æˆ‘å¯¹æ­¤æ„Ÿå—æ·±åˆ»ã€‚â€ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ç¬¬äºŒåˆ™å†…å®¹æ˜¯Wesley Fryerçš„å¸–å­ï¼Œé¢˜ç›®â€œé‡æ–°æ€è€ƒå¯¹æ²ƒå°”çŽ›çš„æƒ é¡¾â€ï¼Œè®°å½•äº†ä»–çœ‹äº†å…³äºŽè¿™ä¸ªä¼ä¸šå·¨å¤´è®°å½•ç‰‡ä¹‹åŽçš„æ„Ÿå—ã€‚æˆ‘è§‰å¾—ä»–åœ¨è®¨è®ºä¸­è¯´åˆ°äº†ç‚¹å„¿ä¸Šï¼Œæœ€åŽå½’ç»“åœ¨ä¿¡ä»°å’Œç†æ€§çš„èžåˆï¼šâ€œæ‰€æœ‰çš„äººç±»åº”è¯¥ä¹Ÿæœ‰æƒåˆ©è¢«ä½œä¸ºç»ˆæžå­˜åœ¨å¯¹å¾…ï¼Œè€Œä¸ä»…ä»…æ˜¯ä¸€ç§åˆ©ç”¨æ‰‹æ®µã€‚è¿™ç§è§‚ç‚¹åŒæ—¶å‡ºçŽ°åœ¨äº†ä¼Šæ›¼åŠªå°”.åº·å¾·ã€è€¶ç¨£åŸºç£ä»¥åŠå…¶ä»–å¾ˆå¤šäººé‚£é‡Œã€‚è¿›è¡Œä¸­çš„è¯†å­—èƒ½åŠ›çš„å¼€å‘å’ŒåŸ¹å…»å¯¹æ‰€æœ‰äººéƒ½æ˜¯ä¸€ç§æ ¸å¿ƒçš„éœ€æ±‚â€¦â€¦æ•™è‚²è€…æ¯å¤©éƒ½åœ¨åšç€è¿™ä¸ªç¥žåœ£çš„å·¥ä½œï¼Œè¿™éƒ¨ç‰‡å­å‰æ‰€æœªæœ‰åœ°è®©æˆ‘å¯¹æ­¤æ„Ÿå—æ·±åˆ»ã€‚â€ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Puglisi</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/#comment-33752</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Puglisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/#comment-33752</guid>
		<description>This was a brave piece. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a brave piece. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sylvia martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/#comment-33751</link>
		<dc:creator>sylvia martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/#comment-33751</guid>
		<description>Wow - you said it all. Terrific piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow - you said it all. Terrific piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/#comment-33750</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/#comment-33750</guid>
		<description>As Kant said, and many others before and after, and as you so well sum here, that each person is an end in him or her self, and not a means. And they are ends, not in the sense that they are deficient, and must be fixed, but rather, are ends in and of themselves. 

Our language sometimes leads us astray, even if we are well-intentioned. We always want to talk about 'worth' or 'value' (as in 'self-worth', say) but the worth is beyond worth, the value beyond value: there is no exchange we can make of material things for a human life.

There's still a lot to talk about - public health care, for example - but this post more than any other you've written makes me feel that such dialogue would be worthwhile, that you have penetrated through the major myths being perpetuated in today's media, and have a grounded and well thought out alternative perspective on things.

Learning isn't about being productive or being able to compete in today's world or even being entrepreneurial. It is about making choices for yourself, being in control of your own destiny, about leading a good life, being the best you can be, however you define 'good' and 'best' to be.

Anything else is marketing. Anything else is someone attempting to subvert the educational system to their own ends - and in so doing, treating students as means to that end, always to the detriment of the students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Kant said, and many others before and after, and as you so well sum here, that each person is an end in him or her self, and not a means. And they are ends, not in the sense that they are deficient, and must be fixed, but rather, are ends in and of themselves. </p>
<p>Our language sometimes leads us astray, even if we are well-intentioned. We always want to talk about &#8216;worth&#8217; or &#8216;value&#8217; (as in &#8217;self-worth&#8217;, say) but the worth is beyond worth, the value beyond value: there is no exchange we can make of material things for a human life.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s still a lot to talk about - public health care, for example - but this post more than any other you&#8217;ve written makes me feel that such dialogue would be worthwhile, that you have penetrated through the major myths being perpetuated in today&#8217;s media, and have a grounded and well thought out alternative perspective on things.</p>
<p>Learning isn&#8217;t about being productive or being able to compete in today&#8217;s world or even being entrepreneurial. It is about making choices for yourself, being in control of your own destiny, about leading a good life, being the best you can be, however you define &#8216;good&#8217; and &#8216;best&#8217; to be.</p>
<p>Anything else is marketing. Anything else is someone attempting to subvert the educational system to their own ends - and in so doing, treating students as means to that end, always to the detriment of the students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Brumbaugh</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/#comment-33749</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Brumbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/04/15/rethinking-walmart-patronage/#comment-33749</guid>
		<description>Wesley:

There are three points you bring up that I think are the crux of many of the issues plaguing education today.  

The first is the fact that we need to teach media literacy and how to sift through information and recognize areas of bias.  Secondly, the idea of teaching entreprenurism.  We need to teach students, through mentoring, how to take control of their own economic and educational lives.  Should we fail in this task, we will create a situation where there will be many thousands of individuals unable to take part in the economy of the 21st Century.  Third, the  idea of citizen journalism.  This idea is related to the first issue I presented, but it is different in that it is the duty of all people to report and share what they have witnessed to others in the society.  To do this, all citizens need to have media literacy skills and the ability to differentiate fact from opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wesley:</p>
<p>There are three points you bring up that I think are the crux of many of the issues plaguing education today.  </p>
<p>The first is the fact that we need to teach media literacy and how to sift through information and recognize areas of bias.  Secondly, the idea of teaching entreprenurism.  We need to teach students, through mentoring, how to take control of their own economic and educational lives.  Should we fail in this task, we will create a situation where there will be many thousands of individuals unable to take part in the economy of the 21st Century.  Third, the  idea of citizen journalism.  This idea is related to the first issue I presented, but it is different in that it is the duty of all people to report and share what they have witnessed to others in the society.  To do this, all citizens need to have media literacy skills and the ability to differentiate fact from opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.193 seconds -->
