<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discouraging lecture hall technology abuse &#8211; Encouraging interactive discussions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2009/08/15/discouraging-lecture-hall-technology-abuse-encouraging-interactive-discussions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2009/08/15/discouraging-lecture-hall-technology-abuse-encouraging-interactive-discussions/</link>
	<description>Weblog of Wesley Fryer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kain</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2009/08/15/discouraging-lecture-hall-technology-abuse-encouraging-interactive-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-93885</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/?p=3714#comment-93885</guid>
		<description>Those videos should be required viewing for all teachers in our district.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those videos should be required viewing for all teachers in our district.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Head</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2009/08/15/discouraging-lecture-hall-technology-abuse-encouraging-interactive-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-93876</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/?p=3714#comment-93876</guid>
		<description>My Son (currently an undergraduate) invited me to join a facebook group called &quot;I pay £3000/yr to listen to lecturers read their powerpoints&quot; with almost 9,000 members. I checked it out and found that Lecturers have replaced OHP with powerpoint and projectors - same old, same old! I remember one of my Lecturers using Kodak Slide transparencies - he showed us 85 slides in a 50 minute lecture - just over 35 seconds a slide. I dread to think what he would have done with powerpoint!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Son (currently an undergraduate) invited me to join a facebook group called &#8220;I pay £3000/yr to listen to lecturers read their powerpoints&#8221; with almost 9,000 members. I checked it out and found that Lecturers have replaced OHP with powerpoint and projectors &#8211; same old, same old! I remember one of my Lecturers using Kodak Slide transparencies &#8211; he showed us 85 slides in a 50 minute lecture &#8211; just over 35 seconds a slide. I dread to think what he would have done with powerpoint!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sowash</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2009/08/15/discouraging-lecture-hall-technology-abuse-encouraging-interactive-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-93844</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sowash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/?p=3714#comment-93844</guid>
		<description>Great post! Thanks for sharing and for encouraging change in education! I&#039;m definitely trying this out in my class this year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! Thanks for sharing and for encouraging change in education! I&#8217;m definitely trying this out in my class this year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley Fryer</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2009/08/15/discouraging-lecture-hall-technology-abuse-encouraging-interactive-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-93791</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley Fryer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/?p=3714#comment-93791</guid>
		<description>I agree, Pat. I have heard similar stories from higher education instructors and professors who teach as facilitators and place responsibility for learning on the shoulders of their students in creating projects, working collaboratively, and having to meet deadlines more independently. I think it&#039;s easier for both instructors and students when the traditional lecture / take notes model is used. Instructionist approaches to education are much more scalable, in a factory-line approach, than constructivist approaches which are actually focused on learning rather than delivery.

I&#039;m sorry to hear your course evaluation experiences were not good, but again I think this is a common experience. I&#039;d like to see some research (which I&#039;m sure is &quot;out there&quot;) on this phenomenon. I think this is the same reason we see many students struggle in online courses where their experiences are often more active compared to more face-to-face lecture based courses. You&#039;re totally right, we&#039;ve conditioned students to be passive learners and expect passive learning. I think NCLB has made this even worse, but we certainly can&#039;t blame this entire trend on politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Pat. I have heard similar stories from higher education instructors and professors who teach as facilitators and place responsibility for learning on the shoulders of their students in creating projects, working collaboratively, and having to meet deadlines more independently. I think it&#8217;s easier for both instructors and students when the traditional lecture / take notes model is used. Instructionist approaches to education are much more scalable, in a factory-line approach, than constructivist approaches which are actually focused on learning rather than delivery.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry to hear your course evaluation experiences were not good, but again I think this is a common experience. I&#8217;d like to see some research (which I&#8217;m sure is &#8220;out there&#8221;) on this phenomenon. I think this is the same reason we see many students struggle in online courses where their experiences are often more active compared to more face-to-face lecture based courses. You&#8217;re totally right, we&#8217;ve conditioned students to be passive learners and expect passive learning. I think NCLB has made this even worse, but we certainly can&#8217;t blame this entire trend on politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2009/08/15/discouraging-lecture-hall-technology-abuse-encouraging-interactive-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-93727</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/?p=3714#comment-93727</guid>
		<description>I recently taught a grad course where I tried to be more student-focused and interactive. My students blogged and used a wiki for collaboration. They learned about other tech tools like wordle, twitter, plurk, etc. and I thought the class went extremely well. My students were engaged, interacting, and collaborating to create new things. Imagine my surprise when I recieved course evaluations and some of the students were not happy that I didn&#039;t lecture and use power point presentations. They felt they did all the work and I didn&#039;t do anything. I believe that students are spoiled by growing up with listening to lectures and just absorbing the information and I won&#039;t go back to that way of doing things. I hope over time, students will change their mind sets and realize that by interacting, collaborating, and creating, they are actually learning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently taught a grad course where I tried to be more student-focused and interactive. My students blogged and used a wiki for collaboration. They learned about other tech tools like wordle, twitter, plurk, etc. and I thought the class went extremely well. My students were engaged, interacting, and collaborating to create new things. Imagine my surprise when I recieved course evaluations and some of the students were not happy that I didn&#8217;t lecture and use power point presentations. They felt they did all the work and I didn&#8217;t do anything. I believe that students are spoiled by growing up with listening to lectures and just absorbing the information and I won&#8217;t go back to that way of doing things. I hope over time, students will change their mind sets and realize that by interacting, collaborating, and creating, they are actually learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discouraging lecture hall technology abuse – Encouraging &#8230; - Local Tech Experts</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2009/08/15/discouraging-lecture-hall-technology-abuse-encouraging-interactive-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-93707</link>
		<dc:creator>Discouraging lecture hall technology abuse – Encouraging &#8230; - Local Tech Experts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/?p=3714#comment-93707</guid>
		<description>[...] here:  Discouraging lecture hall technology abuse – Encouraging &#8230;  :interactive, netbook, presentation, schoolreform, speed, ubuntu, university, wesley-fryer, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here:  Discouraging lecture hall technology abuse – Encouraging &#8230;  :interactive, netbook, presentation, schoolreform, speed, ubuntu, university, wesley-fryer, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Powerful Ingredients for Blended Learning : Discouraging lecture hall technology abuse &#8211; Encouraging interactive discussions</title>
		<link>http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2009/08/15/discouraging-lecture-hall-technology-abuse-encouraging-interactive-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-93706</link>
		<dc:creator>Powerful Ingredients for Blended Learning : Discouraging lecture hall technology abuse &#8211; Encouraging interactive discussions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedofcreativity.org/?p=3714#comment-93706</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross posted on &#8220;Moving at the Speed of Creativity.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross posted on &#8220;Moving at the Speed of Creativity.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/20 queries in 0.028 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 607/632 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: dx8j8q50h69a5.cloudfront.net (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.speedofcreativity.org @ 2012-02-10 05:14:47 -->
